No need for any more study. God is one with no father or son. Done.
Idiot Kafir Abdel-Fadi. In earlier program Kafir Rachid from Douklah Morocco was making fun that Muslims are slaves to God while So called Christians are free. He attacked Muslims use names such as Abd-Allah or Abd-il-Raheem. Now why this idiot on this program is called ABD- el-Fadi,
بعد
سقوط الدولة الاسلامية فيها عام 1492 للميلاد هب المسيحيين بزعامة الاساقفة وارباب
الدين المسيحي للقضاء على كل ما هو مسلم في الاندلس ومحو الهوية الاسلامية للان...دلس
قام النصارى الصليبيين بإجبار المسلمين على الدخول في دينهم
، وصارت الأندلس كلها نصرانية ، ولم يبق فيها من يقول: لا إله إلا الله ، محمد
رسول الله . إلا من يقولها في قلبه
منع اي شخص من النطق بالعربية في الأندلس فأمر بجمع كل ما
يستطاع جمعه من المصاحف وكتب العلم والفقه والحديث وأحرقت في ميدان عام
بدأت محاكم التفتيش نشاطها الوحشي المروع ,كان اعضاء
المحاكم يتفنون بابشع انواع التعذيب بحق المسلمين التي لم يعرف التاريخ مثيلا لها
وتستحق العقوبة لاقل فعل يشير الى الارتباط بالاسلام فلو ان رجلا تطيب يوم الجمعة
وهو من مستحبات صلاة الجمعة عند المسلمين فهو مرتد ويجب تطهيره من كفره بعقوبة من
العقوبات المقررة عندهم
تم تحويل المساجد إلى كنائس ثم جمع من بقى من الفقهاء وأهل
العلم وتم إجبارهم على التنصر، فوافق البعض مكرهاً وأبى الباقون فقتلوا شر قتلة،
وكان التمثيل بجثث القتلى جرس إنذار لباقي المسلمين إما التنصير وإما الموت والقتل
والتنكيل وسلب الأموال والممتلكات
عند التبليغ عن مسلم أنه يخفي إسلامه ، يزج به في السجن
وكانت السجون مظلمة عميقة رهيبة ، تغص بالحشرات والجرذان ، يقيد فيها المتهمون
بالأغلال بعد مصادرة أموالهم ، لتدفع نفقات سجهنم . ومن أنواع التعذيب ، إملاء
البطن بالماء حتى الاختناق ، وربط يدي المتهم وراء ظهره ، وربطه بحبل فوق راحته
وبطنه ورفعه وخفضه معلقاً ، سواء بمفرده أو مع أثقال تربط معه ، والأسياخ المحمية
، وسحق العظام بآلات ضاغطة ، تمزيق الأرجل وفسخ الفك و التمشيط بأمشاط الحديد
و حرق المسلمين وهم أحياء ويؤخذ الرجل فيحفر له في الأرض فيجعل فيها ثم يؤتى
بالمِنْشار فيوضع عَلَى رأسه فيجعل نصفين و تقطع الأعضاء بواسطة الأدوات الحادة
بعد سقوط الدولة الاسلامية
فيها عام 1492 للميلاد هب المسيحيين بزعامة الاساقفة وارباب الدين المسيحي للقضاء
على كل ما هو مسلم في الاندلس ومحو الهوية الاسلامية للان...
دلس
قام النصارى الصليبيين بإجبار المسلمين على الدخول في دينهم ، وصارت الأندلس
كلها نصرانية ، ولم يبق فيها من يقول: لا إله إلا الله ، محمد رسول الله . إلا من
يقولها في قلبه
منع اي شخص من النطق بالعربية في الأندلس فأمر بجمع كل ما يستطاع جمعه من
المصاحف وكتب العلم والفقه والحديث وأحرقت في ميدان عام
بدأت محاكم التفتيش نشاطها الوحشي المروع ,كان اعضاء المحاكم يتفنون بابشع
انواع التعذيب بحق المسلمين التي لم يعرف التاريخ مثيلا لها وتستحق العقوبة لاقل
فعل يشير الى الارتباط بالاسلام فلو ان رجلا تطيب يوم الجمعة وهو من مستحبات صلاة
الجمعة عند المسلمين فهو مرتد ويجب تطهيره من كفره بعقوبة من العقوبات المقررة
عندهم
تم تحويل المساجد إلى كنائس ثم جمع من بقى من الفقهاء وأهل العلم وتم إجبارهم
على التنصر، فوافق البعض مكرهاً وأبى الباقون فقتلوا شر قتلة، وكان التمثيل بجثث
القتلى جرس إنذار لباقي المسلمين إما التنصير وإما الموت والقتل والتنكيل وسلب
الأموال والممتلكات
عند التبليغ عن مسلم أنه يخفي إسلامه ، يزج به في السجن وكانت السجون مظلمة
عميقة رهيبة ، تغص بالحشرات والجرذان ، يقيد فيها المتهمون بالأغلال بعد مصادرة
أموالهم ، لتدفع نفقات سجهنم . ومن أنواع التعذيب ، إملاء البطن بالماء حتى
الاختناق ، وربط يدي المتهم وراء ظهره ، وربطه بحبل فوق راحته وبطنه ورفعه وخفضه
معلقاً ، سواء بمفرده أو مع أثقال تربط معه ، والأسياخ المحمية ، وسحق العظام بآلات
ضاغطة ، تمزيق الأرجل وفسخ الفك و التمشيط بأمشاط الحديد
و حرق المسلمين وهم أحياء ويؤخذ الرجل فيحفر له في الأرض فيجعل فيها ثم يؤتى
بالمِنْشار فيوضع عَلَى رأسه فيجعل نصفين و تقطع الأعضاء بواسطة الأدوات الحادة
The “bird language” or “Green
language” is an intriguing system of codes, practiced by some traditions. But
what lies at its origins – and could its origin actually not be a language, but
what many termed the original method of communication?Philip Coppens
The “language of
birds” has many names; some call it the “Language of the Gods”, others the
“Green language”. Michael Sells has referred to this “sacred language” as the
“language of unsaying”, whereby the core of what needs to be said, is actually
not said, though everyone understands what is being said. The “language of
birds” is therefore the mystical language, by default an unpopular subject
amongst scholars, specifically because of the apparent lack of “clarity”: a
clear and distinct sense. The sense is inferred. And whereas this may be
possible to map in extant languages, when it comes to extinct languages, or even
extant languages the way they were spoken in the past, grasping this “undefined
core sense” is not an easy task. The link with green – as in the Green
Language – as the colour of alchemy is never far away, specifically as alchemy
is equally “obscure” in its words. Alchemy is not so much obscure in what it
tried to do; even when it is clear that the process described is chemical in
nature, the substances themselves are difficult if not impossible to identify.
Birds are also present in alchemy, specifically the phoenix that rises from its
own ashes. But a peacock, the pelican, the white swan and the black crow all
feature in alchemy. Birds in general represented the element air, but at the
same time, their flight was identical to the ascension to heaven. The phoenix
also incorporated the element fire, thus portraying the union of two elements
and its transformative – regenerative – outcome.
What is “bird
language”? On first inspection, it would be the language that the birds use to
communicate amongst themselves. It is a language the birds understand, but we
humans do not. Largely, it is a system of human communication, which has been
around for a very long time, but which is ill-understood. Then again: the
ability not to be understood unless by those who were initiated into the
language was actually its purpose. Fulcanelli stated that the alchemists had to
resort to this means in order to obscure from one that which was to be disclosed
to the other. To many, the language of birds is therefore nothing more or less
than a series of secret codes and phrases, which pass by in daily conversation,
except for those with ears that “hear”. The most famous example of this today
are certain key words, learned amongst Masons. Each group and grade of Masons
has their own specific keywords, which are largely unrecognisable when spoken in
daily conversation. Some of these expressions have nevertheless become part of
normal parlance. One Masonic expression is “to give someone the third degree”,
referring to the strenuous initiation a third degree mason had to undergo. This,
together with a series of handshakes and other signals, identify a person and
his role – whereby a non-Mason sitting in on the conversation may be totally
unaware of what is going on. English is largely void of a “green nature”,
whereas French seems to be full of it. The words “L’hasard” – coincidence – and
“Lazare” – Lazarus – are pronounced identically. But in certain conversations,
people will play with these two words, and ask whether it is “L’hasard” or
“Lazare”, whereby it is interpreted that “Lazare” is no coincidence at all.
Anyone not “in” on the conversation will be completely bewildered and will not
understand. In the final outcome, it is nevertheless clear that Masonic and
the “green language” as present in French is more a system of codes than a
specific “language”. If anything, they seem to be only remains of what was once
perhaps a vast system of knowledge.
Some have
described the “language of birds” as “the tongue of Secret Wisdom. Its
vocabulary is myth. Its grammar is symbolism.” They argue that the development
of the written language and the language of birds go hand in hand. According to
the Fables of Caius Juliius Hyginus, the god Mercury (the Greek Hermes) invented
the alphabet by watching cranes, because "cranes make letters as they fly". The
Egyptian god of writing is Thoth, and his animal is actually a bird: the ibis.
For the Egyptians, hieroglyphics therefore was the language of birds – and one
often recurring hieroglyph is a bird itself. Hieroglyphics is a symbolic
system of writing. Some have argued that hieroglyphs were indeed the “sacred –
secret – language” of the Gods, specifically because they were symbols – and the
Egyptians only used them within a religious setting. Though they were an
alphabet, it is felt that at some point, the symbol itself had a meaning, which
is now lost. What Champollion was able to decode, was only the basest of its
nature – and no-one has since been able to fathom its deepest
meaning.
The
origin of the “bird language” may go back to primitive societies. When shamans
enter a trance, they attempt to speak the language of nature; they are said to
speak “the language of birds”. Historians of religion have documented this
phenomenon around the entire world and depictions of shamans with wings or as a
bird are common. One biblical example is King Solomon. Solomon was told that
he would “be able to understand the language of the birds and beasts… Then
Solomon woke up from his dream. He wondered if God had really spoken to him or
whether it had been a spirit beguiling him in his dreams. Then he heard the
birds squawking and twittering to each other in his garden below. He heard one
suddenly cry out, ‘Silly birds — stop all this noise! Don't you know that the
God has just given Solomon the ability to understand what we say and to make us
do as he wishes!’”
In these
societies, bird language is usually learnt by eating snake or some other magical
animal. These animals can reveal the secrets of the future because they are
thought to be receptacles for the souls of the dead or epiphanies of the gods.
The birds are psychopomps, as birds were believed to undertake the ecstatic
journey to the sky and beyond; they made the voyage to the Otherworld. Equally,
serpents were said to be able to understand the language of birds. In
Christian tradition, some saints are said to have communicated with the animals,
whereas the exploits of St Patrick in Ireland, which involves both flight and
snakes, clearly have the saint following in the footstep of the “Celtic
shamans”. Still, Robert Temple has argued that this “language of birds” was in
essence a large con, practiced by the oracles of the ancient world. He argues
that the “language of birds” was in fact a form of communication: birds were
used as messenger services, as they would be throughout history, until the
advent of modern means of communication. The ancient Greek world would use them
to dispatch information across the nation, whereby the oracles were the first to
receive this information. Therefore, Temple claims, what they prophesized was
not so much “Otherworldly”, but merely information from elsewhere in this world,
dispatched by “express pigeon”, to give the oracles the semblance of psychic
ability.
Most authors,
including Andrew Collins, in From the Ashes of Angels: The Forbidden Legacy of a
Fallen Race, argue that the origins of the association of the bird and the
shaman should be sought within the anthropological realm. He and others have
shown that shamans often dressed up as a bird, or used the feathers of a bird to
resemble a bird. From a man dressed with feathers to an angel is a small step.
Furthermore, the link between the shaman and the bird occurs specifically
because in a trance, the shaman is said to be able to fly – like angels.
But the
connection goes beyond this. In the tenth Homiliarum in Ezcechielem, Gregory the
Great compared the music of the angels, heard in the heavenly spheres, to birds’
singing. This was then encapsulated in the “Gregorian chants” that became famous
throughout the Christian world – and which continue to lure people to churches.
Still, the angels were said not to speak; like birds, they articulated
sounds in the air. At the same time, the sound that was produced was not their
mode of communication; angels – like shamans – were believed to be psychic –
they only
required thoughts to communicate; there was no need for a “language” and the
“music of the spheres” was merely the outcome; in short, music had to be
dissociated from its lyrics, for in origin, music was either felt to be
instrumental, or “Gregorian”.
People who
are fluent in several languages – including many autistic people – know that
thinking often occurs in symbols. They will see an apple, but need to scan their
brain for the word, sometimes in all languages, some only in a few. Learning to
speak is exactly that: the process by which we associate words with shapes.
“Apple.” “House.” “Car.” Words such as “altruistic” or “disingenuous” only come
about at a much later state; not because they are more difficult, but because
they themselves require a definition that is based on other words. So where
does this leave the language of birds? Some argue that modern languages are a
diminutive form of an original, “non-linguistic language”, which is precisely
the origin of the “language of birds”. It echoes the story of the Tower of Babel
and the scattering of the tongues. It is therefore an interesting phenomenon to
note that English, which is a very basic language when compared to other extinct
and extant forms of verbal communication, is making major inroads in uniting the
world once again in a common tongue. Some have even joked that we are getting
God back on the Tower of Babel. So where does this leave the language of
birds? Was it indeed a communication of symbols – whereby the core needs to be
divined, and remains elusive, unless “understood”? Does it underline the old
distinction between “hearing” and “understanding”? Was hieroglyphics an attempt
to bring down into the material world this “divine language”, whereby symbols
were transformed into letters – whereby we are now no longer able to grasp their
core meanings? Birds in the Egyptian alphabet include the Egyptian vulture, the
owl and the quail chick. As such, each played a part in the divine utterances of
the Egyptian gods, and their message to the nation. But it was the Bennu bird's
cry at the creation of the world that marked the beginning of time… for the
Egyptians, the primeval scream was that of a bird…
by Ibrahim B. Syed, Ph.
D. President Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc. 7102 W.
Shefford Lane Louisville, KY 40242-6462, USA E-mail: IRFI@INAME.COM Website: http://WWW.IRFI.ORG
The word bird has been mentioned in the
Glorious Qur’an 5 times and the word birds occurs in the Noble
Qur’an 13 times. Among the birds, the HOOPOE (hud-hud in Arabic) bird has been
specifically mentioned in Surah # 27, An-Naml, twice in the
following manner:
And he
sought among the birds and said: How is it that I see
not the
hoopoe, or is he among the absent?
Surah
27: 20(Ayah)
But the
Hoopoe tarried not far: he compassed (territory) which thou has
not compassed and I have come to thee from Saba with tidings
true.
Surah
27: 22(Ayah}
The hoopoe (hud-hud) is an elegant bird, which is related
to the hornbill. It gets its unusual name from its shrill call of “hoops, which
rings clear and far and is repeated two or three times. Often the cry is cut off
very short. This may be caused by the bird’s bill sharply striking the ground at
the end of note. It is one of Old World nonpasserine birds. Its scientific name
is “Upupaepops” (family Upupidae, of the roller order,
Coraciiformes). King—fishers, bee—eaters, rollers, hoopoes and hornbills
are collectively referred to a roller—like birds. There are about seven species
of hoopoe. It is a widely distributed bird of British Isles, Europe, Asia, and
northern Africa. It exists in the temperate and tropical regions of the Old
World. This is a small bird about 12 inches long, the size of a large thrush or
mynah, and has short legs with heavy feet and powerful claws. It has a handsome
erectile semicircular crest (large crown of feathers tipped with black that
constantly opens and closes on the head). This crest of black tipped feathers on
the head is the most striking feature of the Hoopoe (hud-hud). It is colored
fawn or cinnamon with black and white stripes on the back, wings and tail. The
upper part of its body is a pale brown, with wings of black striped with white.
The underparts are buff, streaked with black. The black tail has one broad
stripe of white. These bands are clearly seen when the bird is in flight. The
short legs it has are well adapted for walking. The tail too is not very long,
black with a white central bar. The beak is long, slender and slightly down
curved. It is long and fanshaped with feathers that increase in length from
front to back. When feeding, the crest is closed. When alarmed or excited, the
crest is unfurled and opens out like a fan.
The hoopoe’s (hud-hud) call is soft and musical, repeated
every couple of seconds. Because of this sound it makes the bird got its name in
many languages. For example in English it becomes ‘hoopoe’, in Persian and Urdu
it is “hud”.
Hoopoes (hud-hud) are usually found in open areas far
away from the patches of vegetation or habitation. They can most often be seen
singly, sometimes in pairs. The hoopoe walks and runs with ease, as it feeds
almost entirely on the ground. The hoopoe walks with quick steps, bobbing its
head in time with the steps and pausing to probe with its long bill in the
ground and in crevices, in search of large arthropods and small vertebrates. Its
flight is strong and direct. When perched, it may quietly flash its long crest
open and shut. Lawns, paths and manure heaps are favorite spots as they provide
ample food for this bird. It feeds mainly on insects and other small
invertebrates found about decaying organic matter. It also feeds on insect
larva, spiders, centipedes and earthworms. The long pointed beak acts like a
pair of forceps, fishing prey out of cracks and fissures. As it dashes along, it
snatches up insects and worms in its long bill. Before the insect is eaten, it
is beaten on the ground to remove the hard covering and appendages like legs and
wings. The bird then tosses up its prey and skillfully catches it in its open
beak.
The bird can soar quite high to escape birds of prey. But
by and large it prefers to fly just above the ground. The hoopoe prefers the
ground to the sky, The hoopoe does not build a nest in the trees. However it
utilizes dark holes in trees or cavities in wall or roofs, soil banks or cliffs
as nests. An untidy collection of grass, straw, hair and leaves deposited on the
floor of the holes makes up the nest. Most of the nests can be found in April
and May in Asia. Six to nine eggs are laid on the debris by the female who alone
incubates them for 16-19 days. During this period she does not leave the nest
and is fed by the male. After the chicks hatch, the mother continues to keep
them warm for another eight days. The nestlings remain in the nest for 2-26
days.
When threatened by a bird of prey, the hoopoe flattens
itself against the ground and spreads its tail and wings. The head is thrown
back and the bill points straight up. Whatever this indicates, it does seem to
discourage potential enemies. Hoopoes (hud-hud) are found in almost all parts of
Asia, even in cities and towns where there are few open spaces left.
Prophet Solomon was a king and the ruler of Syria and
Palestine whose armies consisted of troops made of men and Jinns and birds. It
is possible that the birds were employed for communicating the messages, hunting
and for other suitable services.
In the Qur’an (27:20) we read that Prophet Solomon
reviewed his birds and found Hoopoe (hud-hud) missing. His most mobile arm was
the birds, who were light on the wing and flew and saw everything like efficient
scouts. Prophet Solomon expresses his anger and his desire to punish Hoopoe
severely if he does not present himself before Prophet Solomon with a reasonable
excuse. Within a short while Hoopoe returns and says, “ I have obtained
knowledge of things which you have no knowledge. I have brought sure information
about Saba (a well known rich people of southern Arabia, now the present day
Yemen. Their capitol city was Ma’rib which lay about 55 miles to the northeast
of Sana, the present capitol of Yemen). There I have seen a woman ruling over
her people: she has been given all sorts of provisions, and she has a splendid
throne. I saw that she and her people prostrate themselves before the sun,
instead of Allah.!"
Prophet Solomon said, “We shall just now see whether
what you say is true, or that you are a liar. Take this letter of mine and cast
it before them; then get aside and see what reaction they show.” Qur’an,
27: 27-28.
Here ends the role of Hoopoe (hud-hud). Some people have
interpreted that Hoopoe (hud-bud) was the name of a man and not bird. Because a
bird could not possibly be endowed with such powers of observation,
discrimination and expression that it should pass over a country and should come
to know that it is the land of Saba, it has such and such a system of
government, it is ruled by a certain woman (Bilquis), its religion is
sun-worship, that it should have worshipped One God instead of having gone
astray, and then on its return to Prophet Solomon it should so clearly make a
report of all its observations before him. The counter argument is that inspite
of great advances in science and technology, man cannot tell with absolute
certainty what powers and abilities the different species of animals and their
different individuals have got? Man has not so far been able to know through any
certain means what different animals know and what they see and hear, and what
they feel and think and understand, and know how the mind of each one of them
works. Yet, whatever little observation has been made of the life of the
different species of animals, it has revealed some of their wonderful abilities.
Now, when Allah, Who is the Creator of these animals, tells us that He had
taught the speech of the birds to one of His Prophets and blessed him with the
ability to speak to them, and the Prophet’s taming and training had so enabled a
Hoopoe (hud-hud) that it could make certain observations in the foreign lands
and could report them to the Prophet, then the above said interpreters should be
prepared to revise their little knowledge about the animals in the light of
Allah’s statement. Books such as “When Elephants Weep” and other books on Dogs,
Cats, Ants throw light on animal intelligence, thinking and behavior.
Rachid: I grew in a conservative family in Dokkala, 90 kilometers away from Casablanca. My father is an Imam, and he learned the Quran by heart. I majored in comparative religious studies abroad. I am married to a Moroccan Christian woman and I have three children. My story with Christianity started when I was at Junior high school while listening to an international program on Radio. I began writing to the program in the hope to defend Islam through some Quranic verses that I memorized with the help of my father. The correspondence lasted four years during which I studied several books and readings related to Islamic and Christian doctrines. I also read about famous converted Muslims. I then decided to convert to Christianity.
Aside all the Garbage explanations by garbage dogs Rashid Girgis, Waheed the devil, Shaikh sick in the head and the Pig Morkus ,,, Nasheed al Inshad is very erotic and sexually arousing,
When the clown Armanios (Rasheed) was asked about Jesus whether he is God or Son of God he went into convoluted answer and then suggested to refer to earlier programs.
The clown brain washed man always refer to Islam as the Darkness Islam.
He concur with a caller for the end of Islam and in the future people will ask what is Islam as something of the past. This guy is a Jerk.
Al-Ta7reef alternation and the fixing is in the alteration of the recounts and the quotings of Jesus like I am the truth ,,, or implications who saw him saw God,
The alteration is also through transcribing one manuscript to another by altering the words to indicate more and more the divinity of Christ.
Despite all that there is lot of truth remaining as quoting of Jesus that the father is greater than him with father more of respect than alluding to trinity.
Lot of stories about Jesus re-appearances after presumed Crucifixion is pure, pure bogus like 500 saw him and the Pentecost and appearing in a room entering through the walls.
Also, the Gospel of John and outrageous statements of Jesus tainting him to suggest divinity,
The idiot guy on his TV program claims that Muhamed as he call him benefited from his mission but not Jesus. Now Prophet Muhamed message was to knock down the Trinity. This was his mission and not a personal gain as this kafir pretends.
Insults of so called Rashid .... Muhamed is Taghiyah
Muhamed benefited. Muhamed message was the unity of God and he demolished the Trinity doctrine.
Muhamed suffered a lot in his life to propagate the Oneness of God with no trinity.
,,,
Al-Quraan rejection of trinity and Easa is son of God indicates al-Quraan point to false hood in the Ahl-Al-Kitab book.
Ahl-Al-Kitab does not indicate total agreement with what is in the book.
Akh-Rashid who insists to use this name and not Peter, George or Armanioos recounts story about group of Jews who write the book has no validity.
The “language of
birds” has many names; some call it the “Language of the Gods”, others the
“Green language”. Michael Sells has referred to this “sacred language” as the
“language of unsaying”, whereby the core of what needs to be said, is actually
not said, though everyone understands what is being said. 
The most famous example of this today
are certain key words, learned amongst Masons. Each group and grade of Masons
has their own specific keywords, which are largely unrecognisable when spoken in
daily conversation. Some of these expressions have nevertheless become part of
normal parlance. One Masonic expression is “to give someone the third degree”,
referring to the strenuous initiation a third degree mason had to undergo. This,
together with a series of handshakes and other signals, identify a person and
his role – whereby a non-Mason sitting in on the conversation may be totally
unaware of what is going on. 
The
origin of the “bird language” may go back to primitive societies. When shamans
enter a trance, they attempt to speak the language of nature; they are said to
speak “the language of birds”. Historians of religion have documented this
phenomenon around the entire world and depictions of shamans with wings or as a
bird are common. 
they only
required thoughts to communicate; there was no need for a “language” and the
“music of the spheres” was merely the outcome; in short, music had to be
dissociated from its lyrics, for in origin, music was either felt to be
instrumental, or “Gregorian”.